HOME
rooms & food
|
June 2005 CONTENTS: -------------------------------------------- HEY YOU! Why just read? Talk, too. Head over to the talesofasia Discussion Forum and toss in your 500 riels worth. Some stories from this column are also cross-posted to the forum for further discussion (or not). I'm afraid I'm not going to have much to say about Cambodia this month other than a quick run through some news items as life has presented far more important matters than the latest Poipet scams, the incompetence of SCA, and whether cows need tickets to wander around Angkor. The big day finally came and at 6:21 a.m. on May 25 at BNH Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, Piyapat Matthew Sharpless, our firstborn, emerged from his mother, opened his eyes, saw his father's face and let out a wail. Neither one of us have been the same since. The three of us are all doing great and adjusting to our new roles as parents and child. I've been a stay-at-home dad remaining in Bangkok to help the missus and do my part with the feeding and diapers and cleaning and things. Parts of this column were written one-handed as my other held steady my new son resting in my lap. Plenty of photos here: http://talesofasia.com/matthew.htm for those interested in seeeing the new addition to the toa/two dragons family. And for those with an interest in the state of childbirth in this part of the world, I will post in a few days a mostly favorable review of our experience with BNH Hospital and its staff. You'll have to look in the Thailand section of the website, though. Effective the beginning of this month, the Apsara Authority planned to hike the cost of Angkor passes by three dollars, with the justification that this price increase will be used to cover the cost of a free guidebook to be handed out to all tourists. Almost without exception, other agencies (Ministry of Tourism), businesses (Sokimex, travel agencies, tour operators), and individuals (tourists) have come out in opposition to this plan, and why not? 1.) The Apsara Aurthority would like us to believe that the $3 increase is for a free guidebook. Does this sound like a free guidebook? Sounds like a mandatory $3 purchase of a guidebook. 2.) The guidebook is totally unnecessary. There are already free guidebooks produced in the private sector that don't cost $3, numerous books for sale that cover Cambodia from almost every conceivable angle, and plenty of internet resources as well. 3.) The guidebook is only in English. More than half of the visitors to Angkor aren't even western, let alone native speakers of English. Very useful to the Korean and Japanese crowds. I'm sure they'll appreciate the free for $3 book they can't read, and I would think some might even see this as a bit insulting. Imagine being a westerner visiting the Great Pyramids of Egypt and being handed a free for $3 guidebook written in Japanese? 4.) The book was promoted by the Apsara Authority as necessary for it would include useful information for the would-be investor in Cambodia. Somehow I find it difficult to accept that a group of middle-aged Japanese housewives or some backpackers fresh off Khao San Road are looking to make a half million dollar investment in Cambodia. And even if someone were, methinks it's going to take a lot more than a free for $3 guidebook handed out at the entrance to a tourist attraction to clinch the deal. "Look Martha, this book done say Cambodia's a right proper place to drop a few hundred grand. Let's build ourselves a hotel!" 5.) The Apsara Authority has the arrogance to say that the price increase is no big deal, tourists are rich and can pay it. Nice way to think, guys. Same mentality that gives us $25 departure taxes, $20 visas on arrival that have nothing to do with controlling who gets in the country or for how long, and the general perpetuation that tourists are not human but inanimate entities to be gouged at every possible chance. Keep going to that well guys and one day it's going to be dry... and I bet you'll be first in line to say "Please help us, we're a poor country." 6.) Curiously, the guidebook was not made available for advance public view, but it's out now. It is indeed about 50% investment guide with the other half comprised of general information on the country available just about everywhere, and some rather superficial information on the temples that is less comprehensive than that available from numerous other sources. And the clincher is that it's about the size of an A4 sheet of paper and weighs roughly a kilogram. Real handy for dropping in one's pocket. Methinks paper recyclers are going to do a brisk business by camping out at whatever garbage receptacle is nearest to the ticket booth. In any event, there has been a slight reprieve. The Apsara Authority has delayed the implementation of the price increase citing "technical difficulties", but are handing out the book anyway. Use your imagination as to what these difficulties are. Unfortunately, I've heard a few tourists comment that it really is no big deal, and in the big scheme of things $3 really isn't, which is precisely why the Apsara Authority can get away with it, but we're not talking about $3 to take care of the temples, we're talking about $3 for an unneccesary guidebook which tourists should not be forced into purchasing. It's a bit of cliche, I know, to say it's not the money it's the principle. Therefore, rather than looking at the $3 you'll pay, why not look at it as the $1.5 million they'll get? Suddenly the money isn't so small now, is it? Despite petitions and protests we'll probbaly be stuck with this thing for awhile. The books are printed, someone has an SUV to pay for, face must be saved. What a stinker. There has been an on-going discussion since May 14 here: The Sokimex deal comes due in August. While it will probably be a slam dunk for Sokimex to get another five years to control the ticketing, at least there will be some attempt to pull the concession away. According to a Phnom Penh Post report, Eurasie Travel is going to put in a bid for the contract with their offer of taking a maximum of 10% of the revenue, which is less than what Sokimex receives under the present deal (roughly 20% according to recent reports). Sok Meng, who heads Sokimex expressed no concern over the competition, stating that Eurasie didn't have the cash to build the necessary infrastructure to run the concession, anyway. Curiously, Sokimex had planned to offer a proposal to take over ticketing rights to six remote northwest temples but backed away when competition set in. Hopefully some other firms will jump into the fray, but regardless of who sells the tickets it's unlikely that anyone will notice a difference, as most of what tourists complain about are policies set by the government and not by Sokimex. Sokimex has always sold the tickets per government directive, though the arrangement does make for some easy excuses: Ask Sokimex about a policy and they'll tell you it's a government problem, ask the government about a policy and they'll tell you it's a Sokimex problem. And who said merry-go-rounds were just for kids? Discuss this story here: The old cattle shed and flat patch of dirt that makes up the Ratanakiri airport is due for an upgrade, a $4 million one courtesy the Asian Development Bank. They expect to start by the end of 2006 and finish the thing in 2007 at which point they intend to accept flights from Vietnam, China, and Siem Reap. I'm not quite sure how a new airport will suddenly make it possible to have flights from Siem Reap, as nothing is stopping them now except for a lack of interest. Whatever, Ratanakiri is set to join the ranks of international airports. This would, depending on what happens with the Sihanoukville airport, be either Cambodia's third or fourth international airport. We therefore can expect the crappy French company, SCA, le de du societe du de plu vu I have peanut butter stuck in my teeth concess a du le aire c'est la vie bonjour du aero le port to put in a bid to run the thing. Will they charge the cows to walk across the airstrip? Perhaps employ the cows as luggage porters? Not a bad idea seeing as you can't find a trolley half the time anyway. Where's Sokimex when you need them? Discuss this story here: This one is directly off my discussion forum, posted May 31 by KG:
I've been cautioning people against the Heart for years and this is one more reaffirmation as to why you should not set foot in this place. These are not one-off events that could happen anywhere, but a pattern of repeated incidents of violence which no one seems willing to do something about. Maybe they can't, but whether they can or cannot, that doesn't change the fact that the Heart of Darkness is not safe and should be avoided. There are plenty of places to drink and dance, one doesn't need a has-been of a club that lost its character years ago. It long ago stopped being the bar you read about in guidebooks. This posting originates from: http://www.talesofasia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2771. There has also been discussion on the Heart of Darkness here: http://www.talesofasia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2624.
As I included a bit last month on Khmer fonts and computers, I though I'd pass along this item which appeared on the http://www.camnet.com.kh/akp/english_news.htm:
I don't really have anything to add, it just seemed appropriate in light of last month's column to pass this along. The original Update item and discussion appears here: http://www.talesofasia.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2650 Discuss this story here: I popped in for a few days in mid-May glad to find the building was still in one bit, the staff all present and accounted for, the bills paid, the money collected, and judging by the e-mails I've been receiving, the customers happy. Not that there have been a lot of them. For May our occupancy rate was slightly less than half what it was in February, and a smidgen lower than April. Thus is low season and everyone suffers through it. For what it's worth we never zeroed, but there were a couple of nights we had only one room in. Conversely we were full a couple of times, too. During my first absence the inspectors of the "no guns, etc" fame returned and complained that I was a bad man because I didn't put the signs up in Khmer, too. Excuse me, you never informed us to put them in Khmer, too. Well, I'm bad because I should've just assumed I needed a Khmer version for all the Khmer reading westerners that visit our place. The English part of the signs remains as it was, but we added in Khmer whatever it is the signs are supposed to say. For all I know the signs say, "the owner is a pinhead," but if it makes the inspector's happy, then I'm happy to oblige. The only major issue that developed (that I'm aware of!), and luckily happened while I was there, was a major plumbing problem plaguing the front of the guesthouse. Fortunately only one guestroom is affected as the other rooms are used for staff, storage, etc, but regardless, we have a bit of a drainage problem. I had to leave the conclusion of the problem to the staff (something about a baby coming) after I made sure the plumbers were on the job. When I later contacted my manager for a status report, I got a rather vague, "job not finished yet, have problem, still working." I decided for the preservation of my sanity not to pursue the matter until I return next week for staff vagueness can be attributed to any of many possibilities which in this case might include: 1, She really doesn't know what's going on and wants to wait until I can see for myself. 2, She knows exactly what's going on but it's a big deal and would rather let me come back and see for myself and blow up at somebody else that happens to be standing nearby. 3, the problem is that the plumbers took a holiday and haven't been able to get back to finish the job but when they do it will be done in an instant and there's nothing to worry about. I'm sure there are other possible scenarios as well... maybe when I text messaged she was at the market and more interested in buying pineapples than explaining to me why our pipes were backed up... or maybe they called in the eels and were afraid to tell me? Discuss this story here: With the impending and subsequent birth of Matthew, my own attention to the site was minimal this month, but the following still managed to grace the pages of toa in May: May 30: Sydney resident Matt Kemp's View from Oz returns with: Perth, The Gold Coast, Sydney Scams. ------------------------------ back to Cambodia back to Home All text and photographs © 1998 - 2008 talesofasia.com. Commercial or editorial usage without written permission of the copyright holder is prohibited.
|
|||||||||